Muqaddamah Sooba Saraikistan by Muhammad Akbar Ansari

مقدمہ صوبہ سرایکستان – محمّد اکبر انصاری

Muqadammah Sooba Saraikistan by Muhammad Akbar Ansari

(English title: A Case for the Saraikistan Province)

(First published 1989; This edition 2009; Language: Urdu)

Why it is absolutely necessary to carve out the province of Saraikistan out of preset-day Punjab? The author lays out his reasons with great gusto in this fiery polemic.

This is a case for a province for the Saraiki people who boast a unique language and distinct ethno-cultural ethos. This people inhabit the lower plains of present-day Punjab, the area which is informally known as the Saraiki Belt and includes parts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan and Sindh where sizable populations of Saraiki speaking people are native to those lands.

The argument kicks off with the refutation of objections found in the current political discourse on the creation of a Saraiki province. The author briefly brushes off each objection as unfounded, dishonest or sensationalist and goes on to make a case for the separate linguistic and cultural identity of the Saraiki people which necessitates a separate province.

The book rejects the claims of those who object to the name “Saraikistan” fearing it would lead to further fragmentation of the country.  The author points towards provincial nomenclature current in Pakistan, which are, as they are, already named on ethno-lingual basis, that is, Punjab, Balochistan, Sindh, and now Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa.

It concludes that Saraikis do not demand something unique and new; their demand is in line with well established and existing principles of geographical organisation. Since Pakistan is divided into provinces on ethno-lingual basis, it only makes sense to give Saraiki people their due historical share and thus a province of their own.

There is a further and informative argument from history. A Multan province had long existed alongside Punjab since the times Delhi Sultanate up until when Ranjit Singh invaded Multan province and annexed it for Punjab. Then British came along but they kept the former Multan province within the boundaries of Punjab. It has remained in Punjab ever since.

The book states that provinces were created in British India on the basis of ethnical and/or linguistic identity.  Then it proceeds to give examples of multi-lingual countries like Belgium and Switzerland where every language is accorded state recognition and given equal status in the constitutions of those countries. In former Yugoslavia too, geographical entities were based on language and/or ethnicity and so was the case in former USSR.

When the rights of a people are not given, they resort to violent means. There is a grim warning of the inevitable with the aid of the examples of Hungary and Bangladesh. Hungarian people carved out their own country when Austrians refused to accord equal status to their language, and by extension, their culture. Bengalis who were patriotic Pakistanis, says the author, rebelled against the status quo when Urdu was imposed on them, causing them to separate from Pakistan in favour of preserving their separate linguistic and cultural identity.

A good chunk of the book deals with assessing the demand by some Saraiki circles of the restoration of former Bahawalpur province. It is a bad idea in the view of the author. What Saraikis need is a unified province which includes all Saraiki-majority areas. If former Bahawalpur State’s provincial status is restored, it would leave out half of the Saraiki-majority areas inside Punjab. This would be divisive and counter-productive.

Successive waves of Punjabi migration before and at the time of Partition have caused a population shift in the cities of former Bahawalpur State. A census would reveal that settler Punjabis are actually in majority in most cities which means their political control on Bahawalpur will remain even if Bahawalpur province is created. To counter this, Saraikis across the board will have to unite and demand a unified Saraiki province if they want to end their exploitation at the hands of Punjabi settler elite who now rule the roost in Saraiki-majority areas.

A good picture is sketched of the systematic plunder of agricultural farms in and around Cholistan during Zia-ul-Haq dictatorship. It was a time when a potent and active movement for Bahawalpur province existed. Military and Punjabi bureaucratic elite from Upper Punjab were allotted large chunks of lands and made to settle in Bahawalpur to dilute the political influence of native Bahawalpuri families. They succeeded in gaining access to local votes through state patronage and thus weakened the movement for the restoration of Bahawalpur province.

He cites various examples of discrimination faced by Saraikis in their own lands at the hands of Punjabi elite, who prefer their own kind for civil jobs and appoint officials from Upper Punjab to exploit Saraikis whenever they have a chance. This, he says, goes back to relative underdevelopment of Saraiki areas.

This feeling of alienation and exploitation of the Saraikis at the hands of mostly Punjabi elite forms the core of the argument and the biggest reason, in author’s opinion, that why a Saraiki province is needed. Funds meant for Saraiki areas are diverted and spent on Punjabi areas of the Punjab. This is why Saraiki region, despite being the bread-basket for Pakistan, is impoverished and has high illiteracy rate relative to Upper Punjab. Every medium town in Upper Punjab boasts a state university but there are only two state universities in Saraiki Belt (a third university has been established recently in Rahim Yar Khan) even though the populations of Punjabi and Saraiki-dominated areas are relatively equal. This has led to a situation where civil service jobs mostly go to Punjabis simply because they are more educated. This is worst form of exploitation.

Having laid out the multi-layered argument in detail, let me also add that it’s a political polemic with sweeping generalisations, strong language against Punjabis, knee-jerk rejection of the objections of intelligentsia, and an unwavering faith in the efficacy of Saraiki province as the only and ultimate solution to fix all social and political ills of the Saraiki people.

Advertisements

22 thoughts on “Muqaddamah Sooba Saraikistan by Muhammad Akbar Ansari

  1. I Agree with the analysis. I am a Saraiki speaking hindu settled in India Post Partition, In India, Saraiki speaking populations has almost been finished in India as there was no legal or united Saraiki language party to promote its cause and is now either assimilated in Punjabi or Hindi. New generations write their mother tongue as Hindi or Punjabi…. I am sure this would be happening in Pakistan, where Urdu and Punjabi would have replaced the Saraiki among new generation.

  2. Dear asapd,

    Sorry for the late reply as I have been off my blog for a while. Thank you very much for your informative comment. It’s a pleasure to hear from a fellow Saraiki in India. It’s sad to know that the few thousands Saraikis in India are losing their native tongue to Hindi/Punjabi. In the absence of any concerted effort it’s to be expected that new generations Saraikis in India would lose their language.

    The case, however, is very different in Pakistan. Saraiki have a vast and native base in Pakistan and there has been a surprising resurgence of Saraiki-centric politics and literature during the last couple of decades. The old as well as new generations are well versed in spoken Saraiki. We lag behind other developed language when it comes to printed word but this is also catching up. More people take interest in writing and reading Saraiki than ever before.

  3. Okay, fair enough. There shall be much rejoicing upon your return though, i am sure! =P

  4. Word. Lots of angry penguins for sure, but thats why it needs to hang on to those that like to hang out at the equator. The tigers and tree frogs balance things out a bit.

  5. bhirawo india da punjab asady kolon chota hai per unien zuban di buniad ty 3 hisian tkseem kar detin zuban di buniad ty wal saraiki soba kion ni

  6. saraikistan aik atal haqeqat ha jo aik din zror bny ga punjabi loby esy ziada dair tk nh daba skti INSHA ALLAH

  7. yes i think all saraki’ should have to work togather either they live in pakistan or in India ..or any other country , first they have to organize ” saraiki International Association ” then work on saraiki dictionary ,promote culture ..and most important ..organize saraiki conference

  8. A Saraiki Province?

    “poetry as the resistance ”

    this book Focusing on the culturally and historically rich Siraiki-speaking region, often tagged as ‘South Punjab’, this book discusses the ways in which Siraiki creative writers have transformed into political activists, resisting the self-imposed domination of the PunjabiMohajirruling elite. Influenced by Sufi poets, their poetry takes the shape of both protest and dialogue. This book reflects upon the politics of identity and the political complications which are a result of colonisation and later, neo-colonisation of Pakistan. It challenges the philosophy of Pakistan – a state created for Muslims – which is now taking the shape of religious fanaticism, while disregarding ethnic and linguistic issues such as that of Siraiki.

  9. Tayyeb Jajjvi saheb, thank you for your comments and the information about the book you gave. Is it the same book written by Nukhbah Langah saheba?

  10. In Punjab the population of saraiki are just like salt in flour then why would they demand for stupid saraikistan

  11. Asi apney sonay punjab nun kadi vakh ni hon devaan gay paawain jo marji ho jawey aey gal taanu aan wali punjabi nasal da pegham wa.

  12. Ibrahim, the Saraiki population is far greater than salt in flour. Please check statistics. And also check history. It was Ranjit Singh who added Multan province to Punjab. Before that it was not part of Punjab. Later, British retained it. After Pakistan was created, even the princely state of Bahawalpur was also added to Punjab. These areas were not part of Punjab.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s